26 - 30 April 2026
National Harbor, Maryland, US

Laser radar, lidar, and laser remote sensing methods (all laser radar systems) continue to evolve with next-generationenabling component technologies, advanced systems concepts, new platform integration, high performance computing, AI/ML, and adaptive mission implementation strategies. Combined with advances in signal processing, data fusion, and visualization, the diversity and sophistication of these capabilities continue to grow in support of a wide range of defense, scientific, and commercial applications. The opportunity for participants in these communities to interact, collaborate, and foster innovation in the development of these laser radar systems is central to the success and development of this field of research and is the focus of this conference.

While the development of technology is an important and interesting topic in and of itself, the development of technology is much more effective when considered within the context of the application. Furthermore, consideration of emerging needs in security, counter terrorism, natural disaster response, and commercialization demands innovative solutions for which laser radar techniques appear to be well-suited. These new applications may create additional requirements upon the supporting technologies or an overall new perspective on the technology use case. As a result, this conference will focus not only on laser radar technology, but also on the practical applications of that technology. Topical sessions withing this conference will be devoted to specific application areas including military, industrial, scientific, and commercial applications. Papers are solicited in the following areas:

;
In progress – view active session
Conference 14040

Laser Radar Technology and Applications XXXI

29 April 2026 | Chesapeake 5
View Session ∨
  • Welcome and Opening Remarks
  • 1: Advanced Systems Design and Performance
  • 2: Enabling Component Technologies
  • 3: Emerging Concepts, Theory, and Modeling
  • 4: Realtime Lidar Sensing Applications
  • 5: GmAPD 3D Lidar Data Processing
Welcome and Opening Remarks
29 April 2026 • 8:20 AM - 8:30 AM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Session Chairs: Monte D. Turner, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (United States), Lori A. Magruder, The Univ. of Texas at Austin (United States), Gary W. Kamerman, FastMetrix, Inc. (United States)
Join the chairs for the opening and welcome remarks for this year's laser radar technologies conference.
Session 1: Advanced Systems Design and Performance
29 April 2026 • 8:30 AM - 11:00 AM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Session Chair: Lori A. Magruder, The Univ. of Texas at Austin (United States)
14040-1
Author(s): Joong Yong Park, Brandon Maingot, Teledyne Optech (United States); Malek Singer, Teledyne Optech (Canada)
29 April 2026 • 8:30 AM - 8:50 AM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
Fathom is an advanced airborne lidar system designed for high-resolution topographic and bathymetric mapping in inland and coastal environments. It integrates a dual-frequency 60 kHz bathymetric laser and a 1.5 MHz topographic channel, achieving an effective sounding rate of 240 kHz in full waveform mode. Validation flights over lakes and rivers using Canadian Hydrographic Service data demonstrate sub-decimeter vertical coherence, reliable water surface detection, and depth penetration up to 32 meters. The system meets IHO S-44 Order 1a and USACE QL0B standards, confirming its suitability for precise, single-pass mapping in diverse aquatic and terrestrial conditions.
14040-2
Author(s): James B. Abshire, NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr. (United States), Univ. of Maryland (United States); Daniel R. Cremons, Xiaoli Sun, Kenji Numata, Scott D. Guzewich, Michael D. Smith, NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr. (United States)
29 April 2026 • 8:50 AM - 9:10 AM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
NASA’s Mars science community has identified atmospheric wind measurements as a key objective for a future Mars orbiter. To meet this need we previously developed a prototype of the MARLI lidar to measure the height-resolved wind and aerosol profiles. MARLI is a pulsed 1064 nm lidar designed for a polar orbit and to be pointed ~30° from nadir. This allows measuring the height resolved Doppler shift caused by wind in the aerosol backscatter. Although our work on MARLI showed it is practical for space, its mass and power are large given NASA’s new emphasis on smaller Mars missions. We have recently developed a new version called Mini-MARLI. It uses a similar measurement approach but uses a pulsed semiconductor-based laser transmitter that emits near 780 nm and more sensitive detectors. These allow improved wind measurements with lower mass and power. Our measurement model that uses several different atmospheric dust distributions shows that in the lowest 30 km the wind speed errors were 2 to 3 m/s. We are developing a lidar breadboard and plan to use it to demonstrate wind profiling measurements from our laboratory. Details of the lidar design and its measurements will be shown.
14040-3
Author(s): Florian Pöppl, Martin Pfennigbauer, Peter Rieger, Andreas Ullrich, RIEGL Laser Measurement Systems GmbH (Austria)
29 April 2026 • 9:10 AM - 9:30 AM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
Airborne laser scanning with time-of-flight LIDAR has evolved into a key technology for a variety of mapping applications. Determining measurement range requires associating each received echo pulse with its respective emitted laser pulse, but this association is ambiguous if the round-trip time of the pulse exceeds the pulse repetition interval. We introduce a dual-stage approach to this multiple time-around (MTA) ambiguity resolution problem which performs MTA zone assignment not only based on the raw, temporally successive LIDAR measurements, but also in an additional second step after geo-referencing, based on 3D point coordinates. This second stage processes all echoes which are not assigned to a definitive MTA zone by the first stage (standard code-based MTA resolution), and determines the most likely MTA assignment as the one resulting in the highest local point density. This allows introducing information not just from consecutive laser pulses or scan lines, but also from multiple overlapping scan strips. We discuss dual-stage MTA resolution and analyze its advantages over traditional MTA resolution, especially for difficult target situations.
14040-4
Author(s): Adam Medina, Tyler W. Pfeifer, Zackary Mitchell, Narasimha Prasad, NASA Langley Research Ctr. (United States); Kyle Renshaw, University of Central Florida, The College of Optics and Photonics, Knight Vision Lab (United States); Grady Koch, Apex Photonics (United States)
29 April 2026 • 9:30 AM - 9:50 AM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
A coordinated wind lidar system was deployed during a multi-month campaign to characterize wind conditions in the Planetary Boundary Layer. Understanding wind conditions in this dynamic layer of the atmosphere is critical to ensure reliable UAS operation. The dual-Doppler lidar system successfully measured resolved wind vectors at low altitudes. A severe weather event occurred during the field campaign and the wind lidars recorded wind dynamics caused by the severe weather.
14040-5
Author(s): Dale G. Fried, 3DEO, Inc. (United States)
29 April 2026 • 9:50 AM - 10:20 AM EDT | Chesapeake 5
14040-6
Author(s): Andrew Yarovoi, Georgia Institute of Technology (United States); Christopher R. Valenta, Georgia Tech Research Institute (United States)
29 April 2026 • 10:20 AM - 10:40 AM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
Point cloud semantic scene understanding is increasingly important in robotics and 3D perception, yet most models are still trained on single-dataset, single-sensor data, limiting their generalization and robustness. We introduce an open-source framework for synergistic training across multiple point cloud datasets and tasks, addressing challenges such as heterogeneous feature inputs and inconsistent label spaces. The framework includes a modular design and separate synergistic task heads for classification, segmentation, and detection, enabling large-scale, multi-task, multi-domain training. By pretraining on diverse datasets spanning varied sensors and environments, our framework fosters the development of 3D models with improved generalization, richer semantic coverage, and robust performance in previously unseen or data-constrained settings.
14040-23
Author(s): Grégoire Tremblay, Defence Research and Development Canada, Valcartier (Canada)
29 April 2026 • 10:40 AM - 11:00 AM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
A single-detector hyperspectral lidar covering the VNIR-SWIR spectral bands was built and used to retrieve the spectral extinction efficiency and the backscattering-to-extinction ratio on a mineral oil aerosol cloud. The system probes 105 wavelengths from 420 nm to 2500 nm by steps of 20 nm. The 1750 nm to 2050 nm water vapour absorption band is probed by steps of 1 nm to estimate the system’s tuning precision and to assess the impact of atmospheric absorption on the system performances.
Break
Coffee Break 11:00 AM - 11:20 AM
Session 2: Enabling Component Technologies
29 April 2026 • 11:20 AM - 12:30 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Session Chair: Andre J. Van Rynbach, Air Force Research Lab. (United States)

11:20 AM: Session Introduction
14040-11
Author(s): Felipe De Figueiredo, Fisk Univ. (United States); Michel R. Warren, Sonja Boettcher, Fisk University (United States); Liviu Matei, Fisk Univ. (United States); Elsa Ariesanti, Fisk University (United States); Rastgo Hawrami, Fisk Univ. (United States)
29 April 2026 • 11:30 AM - 11:50 AM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
Mid-Infrared (MIR) gain media have grown in demand in recent years. Since the characteristic peaks in absorption of many organic compounds and atmospheric gases are situated in this region, lasers emitting in this wavelength range have become extremely useful for atmospheric sensing and LADAR applications. Lasing in this wavelength is usually achieved by doping crystals with rare-earth ions that contain the relevant energy transitions. However, due to the low energy associated with these transitions, multi-phonon relaxation (MPR) processes may severely alter the transition rates and make lasing impossible. For this reason, crystal matrices that have low phonon energies are prime candidates for rare-earth doping. In this work, we demonstrate the growth and characterization of crystals that fit these criteria.
14040-12
Author(s): Patrick Lepage, Jean-Francois Rioux, Eric Desfonds, Paul Verville, Sandrine Filion Côté, CMC Electronics Inc. (Canada); Frédéric Laforce, CMC Electronics, Inc. (Canada); Branko Petrov, CMC Electronics Inc. (Canada)
29 April 2026 • 11:50 AM - 12:10 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
This paper presents the development of a COTS 1-mm InGaAs PIN quadrant photodetector for high precision beam tracking in Laser Spot Trackers (LSTs), Precision-Guided Munitions (PGMs), Laser Warning Systems (LWS), and Free Space Optical (FSO) terminal alignment. Targeting defense and aerospace platforms where Size, Weight, Power, and Cost (SWaP-C) are tightly constrained, the module integrates a 1-mm active-area InGaAs PIN photodiode segmented into four quadrants with four application-specific GaAs FET transimpedance amplifiers (TIAs) in a single hermetic TO-can package, delivering a compact solution optimized for high-sensitivity detection for use in mobile or ruggedized defense platforms.
14040-13
Author(s): Jean-Francois Rioux, Eric Desfonds, Patrick Lepage, Paul Verville, Sandrine Filion Côté, CMC Electronics Inc. (Canada); Frédéric Laforce, CMC Electronics, Inc. (Canada); Branko Petrov, CMC Electronics Inc. (Canada)
29 April 2026 • 12:10 PM - 12:30 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
Optimizing the architecture of a NIR optical receiver can significantly enhance detection performance. Achieving this improvement requires a detailed understanding of the photodetector’s intrinsic characteristics—such as gain, excess noise, capacitance - as well as the constraints imposed by the chosen assembly technology, whether implemented with discrete PCB components or through hybrid integration. These factors ultimately define the fundamental noise bandwidth compromise that governs overall receiver sensitivity. This paper examines the impact of key design parameters on InGaAs avalanche photodiode based receivers, outlining how topology, biasing, and front end electronics influence system level performance. Three receiver families are presented, each optimized for specific mission profiles: defend, detect, and communicate. Potential customization paths for enhanced sensitivity, extended bandwidth, or improved environmental robustness are also discussed to guide future development.
Break
Lunch/Exhibition Break 12:30 PM - 2:00 PM
Session 3: Emerging Concepts, Theory, and Modeling
29 April 2026 • 2:00 PM - 3:40 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Session Chair: Martin Pfennigbauer, RIEGL Laser Measurement Systems GmbH (Austria)

2:00 PM: Session Introduction
14040-7
Author(s): Weston Baines, Christian C. Marchant, Carter Sturm, Nathan Beane, Giulianna De La Torre, Army Geospatial Ctr. (United States)
29 April 2026 • 2:10 PM - 2:30 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
In this manuscript a new framework is described for assessing gap fraction and lacunarity of forest canopy from LiDAR derived digital twins. This new approach utilizes ray tracing against the pointcloud derived geometry, allowing for analysis of the effective gap fraction and lacunarity projected along arbitrary lines of sight. This framework is applied to select forest plots to study how effective gap fraction and lacunarity varies with different viewing geometries.
14040-8
Author(s): Megan Manifold, Josh Coffey, Roman Fragasse, Shane Smith, Phillip Barker, Nicholas Wells, Ethan Garrett, Gary Sung, Braden Redick, Grayson Holloway, Ramy Tantawy, SenseICs (United States)
29 April 2026 • 2:30 PM - 2:50 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
This work introduces DARSoC, a radiation-hardened LiDAR system-on-chip (SoC) integrating laser control, photon detection, analog front-end signal processing, and on-chip histogramming for airborne and spaceborne atmospheric sensing. Designed for applications such as cloud and aerosol profiling and hazard monitoring, DARSoC features a reconfigurable time-of-flight controller with 1–50 m range resolution and a 60 km region-of-interest (ROI) selectable within 700 km. The analog front-end supports both linear-mode and Geiger-mode APDs, combining a low-noise TIA, differential gain, and discriminator with 10-bit TDC-based amplitude and timing extraction. Eight configurable channels enable dynamic range up to 120 dB. Fabricated silicon demonstrates accurate laser timing, selectable ROI, dual-mode detection, and low-noise performance (500 fA/√Hz at 700 MHz). The TDC exhibits <1 LSB noise and ±2 LSB INL, achieving <3 cm range resolution and <1.6 cm precision in altimetry mode. By uniting FPGA-like flexibility with ASIC-level efficiency and radiation tolerance, DARSoC advances compact, high-performance LiDAR for next-generation atmospheric missions.
14040-22
Author(s): Zoulaiha Daouda, Georgia Institute of Technology (United States); K. Heath, Thomas K. Gaylord, Georgia Tech Research Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology (United States); Christopher R. Valenta, Joseph Lewis Greene, Georgia Tech Research Institute (United States)
29 April 2026 • 2:50 PM - 3:10 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
Frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) lidar is emerging as a transformative technology in next-generation sensing applications, offering advantages in robustness, precision, and velocity measurement compared to the more commonly used pulsed lidar. Real-world implementations of FMCW lidar vary in terms of modulation methods, spectral usage, detection techniques, receiver architectures, and signal processing depending on the specific application and design requirements. The configurations resulting from combinations of these design elements have varying performance metrics such as range/velocity accuracy, resolution, and sensitivity as well as size, weight, power, cost and complexity differences. This paper presents a review and analysis of FMCW lidar system designs found in literature along with quantitative metrics describing their prevalence.
14040-10
Author(s): Eric Guenther, Anakin J. Martinez, Jeff Perry, Matthew J. Holwill, Amy L. Neuenschwander, Lori A. Magruder, The Univ. of Texas at Austin (United States)
29 April 2026 • 3:10 PM - 3:40 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
Foundation models have demonstrated substantial performance gains across domains. In Earth science, Google’s AlphaEarth Foundation (AEF) model has outperformed conventional spaceborne imagery in many applications. Pre-trained on diverse datasets—including Landsat, Sentinel-2, Wikipedia vector layers, GEDI canopy heights, and Copernicus DEM—AEF shows strong capability in 2D classification tasks. However, its utility for 3D applications, particularly integration with airborne laser scanning (ALS) or spaceborne altimetry, remains less explored. This study evaluates AlphaEarth embeddings for predicting terrain elevation and canopy height across three ecoregions. Using an XGBoost regressor, models were trained with ALS or ICESat-2 as reference data. Results indicate that AlphaEarth features alone are insufficient for accurate terrain prediction without additional inputs, despite elevation-related pretraining. In contrast, canopy height predictions show strong standalone performance. Comparisons with multispectral approaches highlight the promise of foundation models, while underscoring the continued need for high-fidelity laser data to calibrate and validate these methods.
Break
Coffee Break 3:40 PM - 4:00 PM
Session 4: Realtime Lidar Sensing Applications
29 April 2026 • 4:00 PM - 5:20 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Session Chair: Gary W. Kamerman, FastMetrix, Inc. (United States)

4:00 PM: Session Introduction
14040-15
Author(s): George Kachlishvili, Institute of Cybernetics of Georgian Technical Univ (Georgia); Mikheil Nanikashvili, Georgian Scientific Industries LLC (Georgia); Zaza G. Melikishvili, Revaz Kokhreidze, Institute of Cybernetics of Georgian Technical Univ (Georgia)
29 April 2026 • 4:10 PM - 4:30 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
Our project is particularly promising amid the proliferation of small, highly maneuverable military drones, for which no effective detection or tracking system exists. A fast hemispherical LiDAR with a five-kilometer radius and an innovative optical spectrometer has been developed. When the laser beam intersects an object, slight scattering occurs, reaching the spectrometer. For small targets or special coatings, the returned signal may reach picowatt levels, while background radiation can be kilowatts—a ratio of about one to 10¹⁵. Under these conditions, the spectrometer extracts the weakest signals, naturally absent and arising only from target-induced scattering. In traditional spectrometers, main parameters are interdependent, preventing ultra-high optimization for specific spectroscopic tasks. Our physical-mathematical model removes this interdependence, enabling ultra-high precision optimization. Advantages include analog operation preventing overload by multiple targets, immunity to radio-electronic jamming, difficulty of location detection by adversaries, and simplicity and compactness. The spectrometer’s mathematical model remains strictly confidential.
14040-16
Author(s): Ricardo Delgadillo, Bruce Anderson, Jarrett Corr, Anthony Constantino, Advanced Scientific Concepts, LLC (United States); Riccardo Consolo, Abhijit Bhattacharjee, The MathWorks, Inc. (United States)
29 April 2026 • 4:30 PM - 4:50 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
We present a landing‑site evaluation system that uses Flash LiDAR point clouds and deep neural networks to identify safe landing zones and hazards for aerial vehicles. Trained exclusively on high‑fidelity synthetic data and validated with NASA’s Morpheus dataset collected via ASC’s Global Shutter Flash LiDAR, our method combines 3D terrain stitching for DEM reconstruction with learned hazard models. All components, including DNN inference and geometric processing, operate in (or near) real time on embedded processors, fulfilling onboard autonomy requirements. We also compare to a classical SLAD algorithm and demonstrate effective simulation‑to‑real transfer for field deployment.
14040-17
Author(s): David J. Radulski-Bloom, Ronald G. Driggers, Wyant College of Optical Sciences (United States)
29 April 2026 • 4:50 PM - 5:20 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
Event-based sensors (EBS) have attracted intense academic, industrial, and defense interest, yet their real-world impact is often limited by event overload in cluttered or highly dynamic scenes. We address this challenge by using EBS as the detector in an active-imaging system, where illumination structure and timing control the event rate at the source. We develop radiometric models and a simple per-pixel event-detection model to compare several feasible event-based active-imaging modalities, highlighting regimes that mitigate overload while preserving EBS advantages (low latency, high dynamic range, low data volume). We then design, build, and test a proof-of-concept system using an amplitude-modulated continuous-wave (AMCW) laser illuminator. Experiments validate the modeling, quantify overload reduction, and map performance–illumination trade-offs, demonstrating that active illumination can make EBS robust and practical for real-world sensing in challenging, high-motion, or high-clutter environments.
Session 5: GmAPD 3D Lidar Data Processing
29 April 2026 • 5:20 PM - 6:00 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Session Chair: Monte D. Turner, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (United States)
14040-20
Author(s): Joshua Parker, Chris Marchant, Army Geospatial Ctr. (United States)
29 April 2026 • 5:20 PM - 5:40 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
Geiger-mode (GmAPD) Lidar sensors are comprised of 2D arrays of avalanche photodiodes that are record single photon arrivals with 1-2ns jitter. These GmAPD sensors can operate in otherwise untenable SNR regimes, utilizing coincidence processing algorithms to recover the 3D terrain from the noisy measurements. However, these sensors are also susceptible to crosstalk, where the pixels avalanches trigger neighboring pixels to also avalanche due to internally scattering photons. Unlike dark current, these phantom points are correlated with the signal and do not average out, blurring the derived imagery downrange and perpendicular to the line of sight. In this work, we utilize synthetic GmAPD LIDAR point clouds to characterize the effect of crosstalk points on 3D imagery. We evaluate these point clouds both qualitatively and quantitatively, comparing the changes in standard resolution measurements due to the increasing presence of crosstalk points. We also investigate what terrain features are most corrupted by crosstalk noise in these point clouds. We discuss how these various findings could allow crosstalk noise to be addressed from a data-based perspective.
14040-21
Author(s): Weston Baines, Army Geospatial Ctr. (United States); Steven R. Glandon, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Ctr. (United States); Christian C. Marchant, Joshua Parker, Micah Lies, Army Geospatial Ctr. (United States); Thomas B. Clement, Tomas A. Mondragon, Keith W. Conley, USACE ERDC ITL (United States); Richard M. Joyce, USACE ERDC GRL (United States)
29 April 2026 • 5:40 PM - 6:00 PM EDT | Chesapeake 5
Show Abstract + Hide Abstract
In this manuscript, an end-to-end processing chain for Geiger-mode LiDAR at the edge is described. This chain includes GPU accelerated algorithms for pointcloud synthesis, coincidence processing, registration and secondary light detection to take advantage of the additional computational power afforded GPU systems on a chip. This processing chain is applied to data collected with the PHOENIX High CASTLE Geiger-mode LiDAR sensor, and an analysis of how performance scales with system resource allocation is presented, including a discussion of computational, data fidelity, and SWaP tradeoffs.
Conference Chair
FastMetrix Industries, LLC (United States)
Conference Chair
Center for Space Research, The Univ. of Texas at Austin (United States)
Conference Chair
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (United States)
Program Committee
3DEO, Inc. (United States)
Program Committee
North Carolina State Univ. (United States)
Program Committee
The MITRE Corp. (United States)
Program Committee
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (United States)
Program Committee
Institut Franco-Allemand de Recherches de Saint-Louis (France)
Program Committee
Academy of Technological Sciences of Ukraine (Ukraine)
Program Committee
RIEGL Laser Measurement Systems GmbH (Austria)
Program Committee
Georgia Institute of Technology (United States)
Program Committee
Air Force Research Lab. (United States)